4.5 Article

Variation in mate-recognition pheromones of the fungal genus Microbotryum

Journal

HEREDITY
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages 44-51

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2015.68

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF-DEB [1115765, 0747222]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [0747222] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1115765] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mate recognition is an essential life-cycle stage that exhibits strong conservation in function, whereas diversification of mating signals can contribute directly to the integrity of species boundaries through assortative mating. Fungi are simple models, where compatibility is based on the recognition of pheromone peptides by corresponding receptor proteins, but clear patterns of diversification have not emerged from the species examined, which are few compared with mate signaling studies in plant and animal systems. In this study, candidate loci from Microbotryum species were used to characterize putative pheromones that were synthesized and found to be functional across multiple species in triggering a mating response in vitro. There is no significant correlation between the strength of a species' response and its genetic distance from the pheromone sequence source genome. Instead, evidence suggests that species may be strong or weak responders, influenced by environmental conditions or developmental differences. Gene sequence comparisons reveals very strong purifying selection on the a(1) pheromone peptide and corresponding receptor, but significantly less purifying selection on the a(2) pheromone peptide that corresponds with more variation across species in the receptor. This represents an exceptional case of a reciprocally interacting mate-recognition system in which the two mating types are under different levels of purifying selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available