4.5 Article

Capturing antibacterial natural products with in silico techniques

Journal

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 763-770

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9027

Keywords

antibacterial; drug analysis; chemoinformatics; ligand-based drug design; bioactivity index

Funding

  1. Al-Qasemi Academic College [898002]
  2. Ministry of Science, Space and Technology (Israel) through The Institute of Applied Research-Galilee Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to index natural products in order to facilitate the discovery of less expensive antibacterial therapeutic drugs. Thus, for modeling purposes, the present study utilized a set of 628 antibacterial drugs, representing the active domain, and 2,892 natural products, representing the inactive domain. In addition, using the iterative stochastic elimination algorithm, 36 unique filters were identified, which were then used to construct a highly discriminative and robust model tailored to index natural products for their antibacterial bioactivity. The area attained under the curve was 0.957, indicating a highly discriminative and robust prediction model. Utilizing the proposed model to virtually screen a mixed set of active and inactive substances enabled the present study to capture 72% of the antibacterial drugs in the top 1% of the sample, yielding an enrichment factor of 72. In total, 10 natural products that scored highly as antibacterial drug candidates with the proposed indexing model were reported. PubMed searches revealed that 2 molecules out of the 10 (caffeine and ricinine) have been tested and identified as showing antibacterial activity. The other 8 phytochemicals await experimental evaluation. Due to the efficiency and rapidity of the proposed prediction model, it could be applied to the virtual screening of large chemical databases to facilitate the drug discovery and development processes for antibacterial drug candidates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available