Journal
ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 207-221Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.06.017
Keywords
Carbon futures; GARCH; Implied volatility; Forecasting; Energy market
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article examines the volatility forecasting abilities of three approaches: GARCH-type model that uses carbon futures prices, an implied volatility from carbon options prices, and the k-nearest neighbor model. Based on the results, we document that GARCH-type models perform better than an implied volatility and the k-nearest neighbor model. This result suggests that carbon options have little information about carbon futures due to their low trading volume. We also investigate whether the volatilities of energy markets, i.e., Brent oil, coal, natural gas, and electricity, forecast following day's carbon futures volatility. According to the results, we suggest that Brent oil, coal, and electricity may be used to forecast the volatility of carbon futures. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved,
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available