Journal
REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 301-310Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/reel.12038
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Trade in wild resources contributes to the livelihoods of many rural people and communities, particularly the poorer people in developing countries. Livelihoods are central elements of many strategies for conservation based on sustainable use of wildlife. This article surveys CITES' formal engagement on livelihoods, including decisions adopted at the recent sixteenth Conference of the Parties (CoP16). It then draws on examples from debate at CoP16 to illustrate that in practice, livelihood concerns have considerable relevance to CITES parties' decisions on listing species in the Appendices. It goes on to discuss several issues arising from this, and concludes that there are clear arguments for CITES decision making (including listing in particular) to more clearly and consistently address the impact of decisions on rural communities (including through enhanced participation of rural communities themselves), both for their own sake and because these impacts will often influence the eventual conservation success of CITES decisions.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available