3.8 Article

Adsorption of Methylene Blue Dye from Aqueous Solutions by Modified Pumice Stone: Kinetics and Equilibrium Studies

Journal

HEALTH SCOPE
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 136-144

Publisher

KOWSAR PUBL
DOI: 10.17795/jhealthscope-12492

Keywords

Pumice; Methylene Blue; Adsorption

Funding

  1. Research Deputy of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Student Research Committee

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Dyes are one of the most important industrial pollutants, especially in textile industries. Many methods have been proposed in order to remove color from wastewater among which, adsorption is more acceptable due to the ability for its use in the large scale. Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate pumice as an inexpensive adsorbent for removal of Methylene Blue from aqueous solutions. Materials and Methods: In this work the Modified Pumice Stone has been applied for removal of the Methylene Blue dye from aqueous environments. The effect of pH, contact time, initial concentration and amount of adsorbent were considered. In order to investigate the mechanism of the adsorption process, several kinetic models including pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order and intra-particle diffusion were used. In addition, equilibrium data was fitted on to Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin-Radushkevich models. Results: Results showed that the adsorption of the Methylene Blue was enhanced with increasing initial dye concentration, pH and contact time. The optimum pH was 10. The q(max) for adsorption of methylene blue dye from the Langmuir model was 15.87 mg/g. Considering the values of R-2 (0.999) and chi(2), Freundlich isotherm model and pseudo-second order kinetic model had the best fitness. Conclusions: This study has demonstrated that the modified Pumice stone with HCl can be employed as effective and inexpensive adsorbent for the removal of Methylene Blue from aqueous environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available