4.1 Article

Complete genome sequence of Microvirga sp 17mud 1-3, a radiation-resistant bacterium

Journal

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR TOXICOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 347-352

Publisher

KOREAN SOCIETY TOXICOGENOMICS & TOXICOPROTEOMICS-KSTT
DOI: 10.1007/s13273-018-0038-9

Keywords

Microvirga; Radiation resistance; gamma-Radiation; Radiation resistance; Nucleotide excision repair; PacBio RS II; Complete genome

Funding

  1. MIST (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the National Program for Excellence in SW [2016-0-00022]
  2. National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR) - Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea [NIBR201601113]
  3. Ministry of Environment (ME), Republic of Korea [NIBR201601113] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Backgrounds: The genera Deinococcus Hymenobacter, Spirosoma, and Rubrobacter are renowned as an extremophilic bacteria. Most of the species of these genera have been shown to be either gamma radiation resistant or UV radiation resistant or both. Strain 17mud 1-3 was isolated from gamma-irradiated mud sample collected at Boryeong beach, South Korea. Methods: The genome of strain 17mud 1-3 was sequenced and assembled using Pacific Biosciences RS II system. The genome sequence was annotated using Genomes-Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform, Prodigal, and JGI GenePRIMP pipeline. The protein-coding genes were identified using Prodigal, Pfam and COG databases implemented in the IMG systems. Results: The complete genome consists of a circular chromosome (4,403,107 bp) encoding 4,368 coding sequences (CDs) and 4,301genes. Conclusion: The new strains showed both gamma and UV-C irradiation resistance and their complete genome sequence annotation features showed the presence of the genes involved in the radiation-resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available