4.1 Article

Substance P blocks the impairment of paracrine potential of MSC due to long term culture

Journal

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR TOXICOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 283-290

Publisher

KOREAN SOCIETY TOXICOGENOMICS & TOXICOPROTEOMICS-KSTT
DOI: 10.1007/s13273-018-0031-3

Keywords

Stem cells; Senescence; Substance-P

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare (Sejong, Republic of Korea) [HI13C1479]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Backgrounds: Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been considered a novel cell therapy for diverse diseases. MSCs exert their effect through multi-lineage differentiation, immunosuppression, and anti-apoptosis, as proven in diseases like diabetes or rheumatoid arthritis. However, transplantation of MSCs has some limitations; donor age plays an important role in determining their therapeutic activity. Aged MSCs have low proliferative and paracrine potential. Moreover, long-term culture in vitro triggers cellular senescence. Thus, a strategy to enhance cellular activity and block senescence during ex vivo culture is needed to develop efficacious MSC-based therapies. Methods: In this study, we examined the beneficial role of Substance P (SP) on paracrine activity in human bone marrow-derived MSCs from young or aged donors. During ex vivo culture, MSCs were treated with SP and their proliferation rates, cumulative cell numbers, cytokine profiles, and multi-differentiation abilities were analyzed. Results: In MSCs derived from young donors, longterm culture inhibited proliferation and cytokine secretion (TGF-beta and VEGF), which were alleviated by the addition of SP. SP had a marked positive effect on the activity of aged MSCs. Conclusion: Collectively, SP can block the loss of therapeutic potential of MSCs by preserving their proliferative and paracrine potential. This study indicates the potential of SP as a supplement in stem cell culture for therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available