4.7 Article

Histone Interaction Landscapes Visualized by Crosslinking Mass Spectrometry in Intact Cell Nuclei

Journal

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages 2018-2033

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.RA118.000924

Keywords

Protein Cross-linking; Protein-Protein Interactions; Histones; Chromatin function or biology; Mass Spectrometry; Histone interaction network - PTM interplay; Histone variant specific interactions; Nuclear interactome

Funding

  1. Proteins@Work, a program of the Netherlands Proteomics Centre - Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research as part of the National Roadmap Large-Scale Research Facilities of the Netherlands [184.032.201]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [686547]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cells organize their actions partly through tightly controlled protein-protein interactions-collectively termed the interactome. Here we use crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) to chart the protein-protein interactions in intact human nuclei. Overall, we identified similar to 8,700 crosslinks, of which 2/3 represent links connecting distinct proteins. From these data, we gain insights on interactions involving histone proteins. We observed that core histones on the nucleosomes expose well-defined interaction hot spots. For several nucleosome-interacting proteins, such as USF3 and Ran GTPase, the data allowed us to build low-resolution models of their binding mode to the nucleosome. For HMGN2, the data guided the construction of a refined model of the interaction with the nucleosome, based on complementary NMR, XL-MS, and modeling. Excitingly, the analysis of crosslinks carrying posttranslational modifications allowed us to extract how specific modifications influence nucleosome interactions. Overall, our data depository will support future structural and functional analysis of cell nuclei, including the nucleoprotein assemblies they harbor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available