4.2 Article

ABBV-105, a selective and irreversible inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, is efficacious in multiple preclinical models of inflammation

Journal

MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 510-522

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2018.1484269

Keywords

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK); rheumatoid arthritis; lupus; covalent inhibitor

Categories

Funding

  1. AbbVie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase required for intracellular signaling downstream of multiple immunoreceptors. We evaluated ABBV-105, a covalent BTK inhibitor, using in vitro and in vivo assays to determine potency, selectivity, and efficacy to validate the therapeutic potential of ABBV-105 in inflammatory disease. Methods: ABBV-105 potency and selectivity were evaluated in enzymatic and cellular assays. The impact of ABBV-105 on B cell function in vivo was assessed using mechanistic models of antibody production. Efficacy of ABBV-105 in chronic inflammatory disease was evaluated in animal models of arthritis and lupus. Measurement of BTK occupancy was employed as a target engagement biomarker. Results: ABBV-105 irreversibly inhibits BTK, demonstrating superior kinome selectivity and is potent in B cell receptor, Fc receptor, and TLR-9-dependent cellular assays. Oral administration resulted in rapid clearance in plasma, but maintenance of BTK splenic occupancy. ABBV-105 inhibited antibody responses to thymus-independent and thymus-dependent antigens, paw swelling and bone destruction in rat collagen induced arthritis, and reduced disease in an IFN alpha-accelerated lupus nephritis model. BTK occupancy in disease models correlated with in vivo efficacy. Conclusion: ABBV-105, a selective BTK inhibitor, demonstrates compelling efficacy in pre-clinical mechanistic models of antibody production and in models of rheumatoid arthritis and lupus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available