4.2 Article

Predisposition of six well-characterized microRNAs to syndesmophytes among Chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Journal

MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 173-180

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2018.1453277

Keywords

Ankylosing spondylitis; syndesmophyte; MicroRNA; risk; predisposition

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81403378]
  2. China-Japan Friendship Hospital Youth Science and Technology Excellence Project [2014-QNYC-B-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: We quantified the expression of six well-characterized microRNAs (miRNAs) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells to see whether they can predispose to syndesmophytes in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study involving 46 AS patients (23/23 with/without syndesmophytes) and 22 healthy controls. miRNAs expression was quantified by real-time PCR. Results: Six examined miRNAs were comparably expressed between AS patients without syndesmophytes and healthy controls (p > .05). Relative to AS patients without syndesmophytes, patients with syndesmophytes had significantly higher levels of miR-29a, miR-335-5p, miR-27a and let-7i (p = .001, .002, .013 and .029, respectively). Nine significant contributors associated with syndesmophytes in AS, including smoking, AS duration, human leukocyte antigen B27, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, miR-335-5p, miR-27a, miR-218 and sacroiliitis, were identified. The addition of miR-335-5p, miR-27a and miR-218 can significantly improve the accuracy of baseline risk factors. Based on the nine significant contributors, a nomogram was constructed, with good prediction accuracy (C-index: 0.86, p < .001). Conclusion: We provide evidence for the predisposition of miR-335-5p, miR-27a and miR-218 to syndesmophytes in AS patients, indicating a contributory role of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of syndesmophytes. Further validation is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available