4.4 Article

Women's experiences with using a smartphone app (the Pregnant plus app) to manage gestational diabetes mellitus in a randomised controlled trial

Journal

MIDWIFERY
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 102-108

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.12.021

Keywords

Antenatal care; Gestational diabetes; mHealth; Nutrition communication

Categories

Funding

  1. Norwegian Reasearch Counsil [228517]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with controlling their blood glucose values and receiving health and nutrition information using a smartphone app (the Pregnant+ app). Design and participants: The study utilised the interpretative phenomenological analysis method. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants among those participating to the randomised controlled trial. Results: The women experienced sorrow and disappointment when they were diagnosed with GDM, but they all went through a process of learning to self-manage their condition that was strongly motivated by their desire to care for their unborn babies. The women found that the app increased their confidence in their self management of GDM and their motivation for behavioural change. For some women, the app contributed to feelings of frustration or obsession. In addition, some technological problems and a lack of support from health-care professionals limited several women from using the app. Key conclusions and implications for practise: The findings suggest that a smartphone app may have potential for supporting women with GDM, particularly in their blood glucose management. However, it also highlights some of the potential challenges of using mHealth technologies. The findings indicate that a closer collaboration between health-care professionals and patients is of great importance in the implementation of apps for women with GDM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available