4.7 Article

Improving quantitative 13C NMR performance by an adiabatic scheme

Journal

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages 167-175

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2018.04.021

Keywords

Quantification; C-13 NMR; CHORAD; Adiabatic; Measurement uncertainty; Isotope ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NMR is a primary method of measurement that provides quantitative traceable results without the need for a standard of the same measurand. Despite the advantages of the H-1 nucleus, such as high sensitivity, short relaxation times and widespread distribution in organic compounds, some molecules present only labile H atoms, or the H-1 peaks of a sample may overlap with impurities. With the CHORAD scheme - a combination of the pulse sequence CHORUS and adiabatic modulation for H-1 decoupling - this study has shown that C-13 NMR can be used for quantitative analyses with a bias smaller than 2% and expanded uncertainty of 0.7% (for a confidence level of 95%). Since C-13 is found with significant non-statistic isotope fractionation, all the peaks of the sample and internal standard should be integrated and their bulk C-13 abundances obtained by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) must be considered to meet quantitative requirements. Future experimental work may be performed to test this procedure for complex matrix samples. This approach also proved to be suitable for studies of site-specific C-13 distribution and led to better heteronuclear decoupling when compared with the use of adiabatic decoupling with ordinary hard 90 degrees pulses, a combination extensively reported in the literature over the last decade. An examination of the molecules studied in this work and others from the literature revealed an overall trend in the C-13 intramolecular profile - hydrogen-containing positions are often C-13-depleted. A potential contribution of(1)J(CH) coupling to these results is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available