4.6 Article

Effect of grain size inhomogeneity of ingot on dynamic softening behavior and processing map of Al-8Zn-2Mg-2Cu alloy

Journal

METALS AND MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 195-204

Publisher

KOREAN INST METALS MATERIALS
DOI: 10.1007/s12540-017-7324-2

Keywords

alloys; hot working; microstructure; dynamic recovery; dynamic recrystallization

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program (973) of China [2012CB619505]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51301077]
  3. Natural Science Fund project in Jiangsu Province [BK20160560]
  4. Natural science fund for colleges and universities in Jiangsu Province [16KJB430010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of grain size inhomogeneity of large ingot on the hot deformation behavior of Al-8Zn-2Mg-2Cu alloy were investigated using hot compression tests over a temperature range from 300 A degrees C to 450 A degrees C with strain rate from 0.1 s(-1) to 10 s(-1). It was found that the grain size (100 mu m) in surface layer of the ingot is finer than that of the central layer (> 200 mu m). The surface specimen exhibited lower flow stress than that of central one in the temperature range from 350 A degrees C to 450 A degrees C and the strain rate range from 0.1 s(-1) to 1 s(-1). The softening mechanism is dynamic recovery, together with a partial dynamic recrystallization (DRX) at high temperature and low strain rate condition regardless the grain size. The nucleation mechanism of DRX is the strain induced grain boundary migration. Therefore, the DRX fraction is higher in surface specimen because the higher grain boundary density provides more nucleation sites. Based on processing maps, the applicable hot deformation parameters for the large size ingot are determined to be at the temperature range of 440-450 A degrees C and the strain rate of 0.1-0.3 s(-1) when taking the grain size inhomogeneity into account.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available