4.5 Article

Comparison of ICD-10R, DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 in an Adult Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnostic Clinic

Journal

JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS
Volume 43, Issue 11, Pages 2515-2525

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-013-1799-6

Keywords

Autism Spectrum Disorder; Diagnosis; Prevalence; DSM-5

Funding

  1. MRC [G9817803] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G9817803] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institute for Health Research [RP-PG-0606-1045] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [G9817803] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Department of Health [CDRF-2012-03-059, RP-PG-0606-1045] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diagnosis is often used to access services. We investigated whether ASD diagnostic outcome varied when DSM-5 was used compared to ICD-10R and DSM-IV-TR in a clinical sample of 150 intellectually able adults. Of those diagnosed with an ASD using ICD-10R, 56 % met DSM-5 ASD criteria. A further 19 % met DSM-5 (draft) criteria for Social Communication Disorder. Of those diagnosed with Autistic Disorder/Asperger Syndrome on DSM-IV-TR, 78 % met DSM-5 ASD criteria. Sensitivity of DSM-5 was significantly increased by reducing the number of criteria required for a DSM-5 diagnosis, or by rating 'uncertain' criteria as 'present', without sacrificing specificity. Reduced rates of ASD diagnosis may mean some ASD individuals will be unable to access clinical services.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available