4.2 Article

Event-related potentials to intact and disrupted actions in children and adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 116, Issue 2, Pages 453-470

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.013

Keywords

Event-related potentials (ERPs); Development; Novel events; Action understanding; Event segmentation; Spatial learning

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01HD068458, R01 HD068458] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [T32 DC007361, T32 DC7361-03, T32 DC000041] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current research used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate neurophysiological responses to intact and disrupted actions embedded within an event in children and adults. Responses were recorded as children (24-month-olds) and adults observed a relatively novel event composed of three actions. In one condition pauses were inserted at intact boundaries (i.e., at the endpoint of each action), whereas in the other condition they were inserted at breakpoints that disrupted the action (i.e., in the middle of each action). Evoked responses revealed differences across conditions in both groups; disrupted actions elicited a prolonged negative slow wave from 100 to 700 ms in children, whereas adults demonstrated two distinct negative peaks between 50-150 and 250-350 ms. These findings contribute the first electrophysiological evidence that children readily detect disruptions to ongoing events by the end of the second year, even with limited exposure to the event itself. Furthermore, they suggest that adults rely on two distinct mechanisms when processing novel events. Results are discussed in relation to the role of perceptual and conceptual levels of analysis in the development of action processing. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available