4.5 Article

Retrospective analysis of the risk of hemorrhage associated with moderate and severe thrombocytopenia of 173 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 97, Issue 27, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011356

Keywords

hemorrhage; lupus erythematosus; thrombocytopenia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the study was to observe the risk of hemorrhage from moderate and severe thrombocytopenia in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A retrospective analysis was undertaken of cases admitted to Qilu Hospital, China. Blood platelet counts (BPCs) of <= 20 x 10(9)/L represent severe thrombocytopenia, and a BPC of 21 to 50 x 10(9)/L indicates moderate thrombocytopenia. A comparison was made from the perspective of severity with a view to determine the influence of thrombocytopenia on the risk of hemorrhage and the results. Moderate and severe thrombocytopenia occurred in 173 cases, accounting for 15.2% of the total hospitalized patients with SLE with a male to female ratio of 1:23.7. The average age of those patients was 34.8 +/- 14.6 years. In the group of severe thrombocytopenia, patients without visceral involvement had a mean age of onset of 31.4 +/- 14.2 years with a median of 28.0 years compared with 37.8 +/- 14.8 years with a median of 38.5 years for patients with visceral involvement; this difference was statistically significant (P=.034). Seventy-one (76.3%) of 93 patients with severe thrombocytopenia and 20 (25.0%) of 80 patients with moderate thrombocytopenia developed hemorrhagic conditions of various grades, the difference between both were markedly statistically significant. Twenty-three patients with SLE died. Nine deaths were due to a hemorrhage caused by thrombocytopenia, while more were caused by infection. Severe thrombocytopenia is a significant adverse prognostic factor of SLE. SLE with the main manifestation of thrombocytopenia tends to make younger visceral organ owners suffer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available