4.3 Review

Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies and Multiple Sclerosis: The Essentials

Journal

MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 144-154

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1573406413666170906121828

Keywords

Alemtuzumab; daclizumab; monoclonal antibodies; natalizumab; ocrelizumab; ofatumumab; phage peptide libraries; rituximab; transgenic mice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are now established as targeted therapies for malignancies, transplant rejection, autoimmune and infectious diseases. Two monoclonal antibodies are available for treatment and other antibodies are currently being tested in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Objectives: The purpose of the present review paper is to outline the antibody engineering technologies, the immunologic and pharmacologic concepts of mAbs and the current status of treatment in MS with emphasis on clinical efficacy and safety. Method: We conducted a through review of the scientific literature published until 31 December 2014 (print and electronic publications) concerning the production, applications and side effects of the use of Mabs. Sixty five articles were used in total (both original research and review papers). Conclusion: With the introduction of mAbs the treatment of MS has entered a new era, both with respect to efficacy and target specificity. However, administration of mAbs carries the risk of immune reactions such as acute anaphylaxis, serum sickness, infection and other autoimmune diseases. In addition, unexpected consequences arise from our incomplete knowledge of the immune system. For example, natalizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting alpha 4-integrin on leukocytes increases the risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, without causing notable immunosuppression. Further study on the use of mabs is required, both in vitro and in the clinical field, in order to increase our knowledge upon these new revolutionary therapeutic agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available