4.6 Article

Geant4-DNA example applications for track structure simulations in liquid water: A report from the Geant4-DNA Project

Journal

MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 45, Issue 8, Pages E722-E739

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mp.13048

Keywords

dosimetry; Geant4-DNA; liquid water; Monte Carlo; track structure

Funding

  1. French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) Projet International de Cooperation Scientifique (PICS) [7340]
  2. University of Bordeaux Initiative of Excellence-France-International Postdoctorates program
  3. University of Bordeaux Initiative of Excellence-FranceInternational Doctorates program
  4. Conselho Nacional para o Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq), in Brazil [306775/2015-8]
  5. FAPESP foundation, in Brazil [2011/51594-2]
  6. European Space Agency [4000112863/14/NL/HB]
  7. Australian Research Council [ARC DP170100967]
  8. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [11/51594-2] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This Special Report presents a description of Geant4-DNA user applications dedicated to the simulation of track structures (TS) in liquid water and associated physical quantities (e.g., range, stopping power, mean free path...). These example applications are included in the Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit and are available in open access. Each application is described and comparisons to recent international recommendations are shown (e.g., ICRU, MIRD), when available. The influence of physics models available in Geant4-DNA for the simulation of electron interactions in liquid water is discussed. Thanks to these applications, the authors show that the most recent sets of physics models available in Geant4-DNA (the so-called option4 and option 6 sets) enable more accurate simulation of stopping powers, dose point kernels, and W-values in liquid water, than the default set of models (option 2) initially provided in Geant4-DNA. They also serve as reference applications for Geant4-DNA users interested in TS simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available