4.6 Article

Evaluating blood clot progression using magnetic particle spectroscopy

Journal

MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 45, Issue 7, Pages 3258-3263

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mp.12983

Keywords

magnetic fields; nanoparticle's imaging; quantitative imaging; spectroscopic imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo evaluate the thrombus maturity noninvasively providing the promise of much earlier and more accurate diagnosis of diseases ranging from stroke to myocardial infarction to deep vein thrombosis. MethodsMagnetic spectroscopy of nanoparticle Brownian rotation (MSB), a form of magnetic particle spectroscopy sensitive to Brownian rotation of magnetic nanoparticles, was used for the detection and characterization of blood clots. The nanoparticles' relaxation time was quantified by scaling the MSB spectra in frequency to match the spectra from nanoparticles in a reference state. The nanoparticles' relaxation time, in the bound state, was used to characterize the nanoparticle binding to thrombin on the blood clot. The number of nanoparticles bound to the clot was also estimated. Both the relaxation time and the weight of bound nanoparticles were obtained for clots of several ages, reflecting different stages of development and organization. The impact of clot development was explored using functionalized nanoparticles present during clot formation. ResultsThe relaxation time of the bound nanoparticles decreases for more mature, organized clots. The number of nanoparticles able to bind the clot diminishes quantitatively with clot age. On mature clots, the nanoparticles bind the thrombin on the surface while for developing clots the nanoparticles bind several thrombin molecules or become trapped in the clot matrix during formation. ConclusionsBy estimating the magnetic nanoparticles' relaxation time the clot age and organization can be predicted. The purposed methods are quick and minimally invasive for invivo applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available