Phantom, clinical, and texture indices evaluation and optimization of a penalized-likelihood image reconstruction method (Q.Clear) on a BGO PET/CT scanner

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate the behavior of a penalized-likelihood image reconstruction method (Q.Clear) under different count statistics and lesion-to-background ratios (LBR) on a BGO scanner, in order to obtain an optimum penalization factor ( value) to study and optimize for different acquisition protocols and clinical goals. MethodsBoth phantom and patient images were evaluated. Data from an image quality phantom were acquired using different Lesion-to-Background ratios and acquisition times. Then, each series of the phantom was reconstructed using values between 50 and 500, at intervals of 50. Hot and cold contrasts were obtained, as well as background variability and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Fifteen F-18-FDG patients (five brain scans and 10 torso acquisitions) were acquired and reconstructed using the same values as in the phantom reconstructions. From each lesion in the torso acquisition, noise, contrast, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were computed. Image quality was assessed by two different nuclear medicine physicians. Additionally, the behaviors of 12 different textural indices were studied over 20 different lesions. ResultsQ.Clear quantification and optimization in patient studies depends on the activity concentration as well as on the lesion size. In the studied range, an increase on is translated in a decrease in lesion contrast and noise. The net product is an overall increase in the SNR, presenting a tendency to a steady value similar to the CNR in phantom data. As the activity concentration or the sphere size increase the optimal increases, similar results are obtained from clinical data. From the subjective quality assessment, the optimal value for torso scans is in a range between 300 and 400, and from 100 to 200 for brain scans. For the recommended torso values, texture indices present coefficients of variation below 10%. ConclusionsOur phantom and patients demonstrate that improvement of CNR and SNR of Q.Clear algorithm which depends on the studied conditions and the penalization factor. Using the Q.Clear reconstruction algorithm in a BGO scanner, a value of 350 and 200 appears to be the optimal value for 18F-FDG oncology and brain PET/CT, respectively.