4.1 Article

Cost-Effective Adjustments to Nursing Home Staffing to Improve Quality

Journal

MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW
Volume 77, Issue 3, Pages 274-284

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1077558718778081

Keywords

nursing homes; return on investment; quality; deficiencies; deficiency score

Funding

  1. Retirement Research Foundation of Chicago: RRF [2017-168]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Health care providers face fixed reimbursement rates from government sources and need to carefully adjust staffing to achieve the highest quality within a given cost structure. With data from the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (1999-2015), this study holistically examined how staffing levels affect two publicly reported measures of quality in the nursing home industry, the number of deficiency citations and the deficiency score. While higher staffing consistently yielded better quality, the largest quality improvements resulted from increasing administrative registered nurses and social service staffing. After adjusting for wages, the most cost-effective investment for improving overall deficiency outcomes was increasing social services. Deficiencies related to quality of care were improved most by increasing administrative nursing and social service staff. Quality of life deficiencies were improved most by increasing social service and activities staff. Approaches to improve quality through staffing adjustments should target specific types of staff to maximize return on investment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available