4.7 Article

Voltammetric electronic tongue combined with chemometric techniques for direct identification of creatinine level in human urine

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages 178-184

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.044

Keywords

Voltammetric electronic tongue; Electrodes; Chemometrics; Urinary creatinine content; UV-Vis spectrophotometry; Jaffe's reaction

Funding

  1. TROPSENSE under H2020-MSCA-RISE project [645758]
  2. University of Moulay Ismail

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urinary creatinine content (UCC) has been investigated as a promising approach for health states monitoring. Most of the techniques used for UCC detection are non-portable and require dilution with other reagents. This study aims to investigate the ability of a Voltammetric Electronic tongue (VE-tongue) combined with chemometrics to discriminate and identify UCC patterns of 59 volunteers without any dilution. The UCC measured by VE-tongue system were related with those found by Jaffe's reaction as a reference method. Loading analysis was carried out to examine the electrodes and features contribution. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs) were implemented to analyze VE-tongue data. Furthermore, Partial Least Squares-regression (PLS-regression) was trained to correlate VE-tongue data with the reference measurement in order to build and validate a prediction model for UCC determination. The obtained results demonstrate that PCA and SVMs could classified urine samples into three classes according to low, medium and high creatinine levels (CLs). Promising findings were also obtained in the identification of a new measurement set. Moreover, high correlation coefficients were obtained between the electrochemical technique and spectroscopic Jaffe's method using PLS-regression. This demonstrates a well promising tool for simple alternative process for UCC determination without dilution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available