4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Weak convergence and optimal tuning of the reversible jump algorithm

Journal

MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages 32-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2018.06.007

Keywords

Markov chain Monte Carlo methods; Metropolis-Hastings algorithms; Model selection; Optimal scaling; Random walk Metropolis algorithms

Funding

  1. NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada)
  2. FRQNT (Le Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Nature et technologies)
  3. SOA (Society of Actuaries)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reversible jump algorithm is a useful Markov chain Monte Carlo method introduced by Green (1995) that allows switches between subspaces of differing dimensionality, and therefore, model selection. Although this method is now increasingly used in key areas (e.g. biology and finance), it remains a challenge to implement it. In this paper, we focus on a simple sampling context in order to obtain theoretical results that lead to an optimal tuning procedure for the considered reversible jump algorithm, and consequently, to easy implementation. The key result is the weak convergence of the sequence of stochastic processes engendered by the algorithm. It represents the main contribution of this paper as it is, to our knowledge, the first weak convergence result for the reversible jump algorithm. The sampler updating the parameters according to a random walk, this result allows to retrieve the well-known 0.234 rule for finding the optimal scaling. It also leads to an answer to the question: with what probability should a parameter update be proposed comparatively to a model switch at each iteration? Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (IMACS). All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available