4.4 Article

Low inappropriate shock rates in patients with single- and dual/triple-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using a novel suite of detection algorithms: Pain Free SST trial primary results

Journal

HEART RHYTHM
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 926-936

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.01.017

Keywords

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Atrial fibrillation; Inappropriate shock

Funding

  1. Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  2. Medtronic
  3. Sorin
  4. St. Jude Medical
  5. Boston Scientific

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND The benefits of implantable cardioverterdefibrillators (ICDs) have been well demonstrated in many clinical trials, and ICD shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias save Lives. However, inappropriate and unnecessary shock delivery remains a significant clinical issue with considerable consequences for patients and the healthcare system. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the PainFree SmartShock Technology (SST) study was to investigate new-generation ICDs to reduce inappropriate and unnecessary shocks through novel discrimination algorithms with modern programming strategies. METHODS This prospective, multicenter clinical trial enrolled 2790 patients with approved indication for ICD implantation (79% male, mean age 65 years; 69 /a primary prevention indication, 27% singlechamber ICD, 33% replacement or upgrade). Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months, and mean follow-up was 22 months. The primary end-point of the study was the percentage of patients remaining free of inappropriate shocks at 1 year postimplant, analyzed separately for dual/triple-chamber ICDs (N = 2019) and single-chamber ICDs (N = 751). RESULTS The inappropriate shock rate at 1 year was 1.5% for patients with dual/triple-chamber ICDs and 2.5% for patients with single-chamber devices. Two years postimplant, the inappropriate shock rate was 2.8% for patients with dual-/triple chamber ICDs and 3.7% for those with single-chamber ICDs. The most common cause of an inappropriate shock in both groups was atrial fibrillation or flutter. CONCLUSION In a large patient cohort receiving ICDs for primary or secondary prevention, the adoption of novel enhanced detection algorithms in conjunction with routine implementation of modern programming strategies Led to a very Low inappropriate shock rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available