4.4 Article

Left atrial function, a new predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Journal

HEART RHYTHM
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 1800-1806

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.021

Keywords

Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Left atrial function; Strain imaging; Echocardiography

Funding

  1. La Fondation de L'Avenir

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular (LV) function and induces LV remodeling, and it is an established therapy for advanced heart failure with prolonged QRS duration. One third of patients will not benefit from this invasive therapy. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether left atrial (LA) strain imaging (epsilon) parameters could help in predicting the response in terms of LV reverse remodeling after CRT. METHODS A total of 79 patients who underwent CRT were evaluated with echography before implantation. LA function and LV function were assessed with M-mode, 2-dimensional echocardiography, Doppler, tissue Doppler velocity, and epsilon. LV reverse remodeling was defined as a > 15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume. RESULTS At 6 months, 54 patients (68%) were responders to CRT. In multivariable logistic regression, LA systolic peak of strain rate (SRA) (odds ratio [OR] 10.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.76-62.1, P = .01), left bundle branch block (OR 6.8, 95% CI 1.06-43.9, P = .04), ischemic cardiomyopathy (OR 3.93, 95% CI 1.07-14.4, P = .04), and LV preejection index (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, P = .01) were associated with CRT response. With an SRA cutoff of 0.75%, the negative predictive value for predicting CRT response was 0.62. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the possible relevance of assessing LA function before CRT. SRA appeared to be a good predictor of CRT response. Integrating this LA function analysis into the multivariable assessment of patient candidates for CRT should be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available