4.8 Review

Nanocellulose as a natural source for groundbreaking applications in materials science: Today's state

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 720-748

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Free State of Thuringia
  2. European Social Fund [2016 FGR 0045]
  3. Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy, ZIM [KF2748903MF4, KF2386003MF3]
  4. QREN (Quadro de Referencia Estrategica Nacional) through the Bio-TecNorte operation - European Regional Development Fund [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004]
  5. RISE Bioeconomy
  6. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN 402329]
  7. PGSD graduate student scholarship
  8. Faculty of Engineering at McMaster University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanocelluloses are natural materials with at least one dimension in the nano-scale. They combine important cellulose properties with the features of nanomaterials and open new horizons for materials science and its applications. The field of nanocellulose materials is subdivided into three domains: biotechnologically produced bacterial nanocellulose hydrogels, mechanically delaminated cellulose nanofibers, and hydrolytically extracted cellulose nanocrystals. This review article describes today's state regarding the production, structural details, physicochemical properties, and innovative applications of these nanocelluloses. Promising technical applications including gels/foams, thickeners/stabilizers as well as reinforcing agents have been proposed and research from last five years indicates new potential for groundbreaking innovations in the areas of cosmetic products, wound dressings, drug carriers, medical implants, tissue engineering, food and composites. The current state of worldwide commercialization and the challenge of reducing nanocellulose production costs are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available