4.7 Article

On the failure mechanism for high pressure die casting A390 hypereutectic alloy in low cycle and high cycle fatigue

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.03.037

Keywords

X-ray tomography; Hypereutectic Al-Si alloy; Primary silicon morphology; Fatigue

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775297]
  2. Joint Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1537202]
  3. National Science and the Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [20151080370]
  4. UK Royal Academy of Engineering/Royal Society through the Newton International Fellowship Scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fatigue failure behavior of A390 hypereutectic aluminum alloy plate was studied with laboratory CT and such technique provided a new method for analyses of the mechanical failure. Results were based on the reconstructed fractography and SEM observation and special attention was paid to crack propagation mechanism in the hypereutectic alloy. The fatigue crack surface was separated into crack initiation site around pores, flat crack propagation zone and instantaneous crack zone. While the flat crack propagation zone only occurred in high cycle fatigue and the height fluctuation of flat propagation was within 50 gm. The disappearance of flat propagation in low cycle fatigue showed the different crack propagation mechanism between hypereutectic and hypoeutectic alloy. Different crack propagation stage changed with the stress intensity of crack tip. The flat propagation zones for high cycle fatigue attributed to the relatively parallel extension of crack and debonding between PSPs and matrix in hypereutectic alloy. While under higher stress intensity like the case in LCF or later stage of HCF, the crack branched and extended instantaneously, tortuous crack propagation route formed and many PSPs with minor cracks or striations remained.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available