4.3 Article

Biocompatibility assessment of graphene oxide-hydroxyapatite coating applied on TiO2 nanotubes by ultrasound-assisted pulse electrodeposition

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.02.012

Keywords

Hydroxyapatite; Graphene oxide; Ultrasound-assisted electrodeposition; Biocompatibility; Simulated body fluid

Funding

  1. Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the ultrasound-assisted pulse electrodeposition was introduced to fabricate the graphene oxide (GO)-hydroxyapatite (HA) coating on TiO2 nanotubes. The results of the X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscope (STIR), Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) and micro-Raman spectroscopy showed the successful synthesis of GO. The Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images revealed that in the presence of ultrasonic waves and GO sheets a more compact HA-based coating with refined microstructure could be formed on the pretreated titanium. The results of micro-Raman analysis confirmed the successful incorporation of the reinforcement filler of GO into the coating electrodeposited by the ultrasound-assisted method. The FTIR analysis showed that the GO-HA coating was consisted predominantly of the B-type carbonated HA (CHA) phase. The pretreatment of the substrate and incorporation of the GO sheets into the HA coating had a significant effect on improving the bonding strength at the coating-substrate interface. Moreover, the results of the fibroblast cell culture and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MIT) assay after 2 days demonstrated a higher percentage of cell activity for the GO-HA coated sample. Finally, the 7 day exposure to simulated body fluid (SBF) showed a faster rate of apatite precipitation on the GO-HA coating, as compared to the HA coating and pretreated titanium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available