4.6 Article

Comparative study of different scalable routes to synthesize graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 203, Issue -, Pages 284-292

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.10.013

Keywords

Graphene oxide; Oxidation; Improve Hummers method; Potassium ferrate; Functional oxygen groups

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon research and innovation program [646397]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene oxide is considered one of the most significant material due to its capability of be a reliable and potentially scalable precursor of graphene. Several processes of graphene mass production are getting involved into very polluting oxidants, toxic gases emissions, explosions and deflagrations or even longtime reactions. In the present work, two different routes were carried out in order to obtain reduced graphene oxide. On the one hand, a modification of Improved Hummers method whose modifications efficiently reduce the reaction time and the amount of chemical reagents. On the other hand, an environmentally friendly, fast and economic method which use potassium ferrate as oxidizing agent. Products obtained by both methods were characterized with different techniques: Raman spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, FT-IR, elemental analysis (EDX), X-Ray Diffraction, Thermogravimetric Analysis, DSC and particle size analyzer. Results acquired by the modified Improved Hummers Method are more effective than that one based on potassium ferrate as oxidizing agent. However, in spite of the lower oxidation degree achieved in the last one, the resulting material suffered important physicochemical structural changes which are explained in detail. These changes could be of interest for anticipating future applications of graphene-based materials. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available