4.2 Article

Differential copper toxicity in invasive and native ascidians of New England provides support for enhanced invader tolerance

Journal

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 595, Issue -, Pages 135-147

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps12555

Keywords

Ascidians; Invasive; Ecotoxicology; Acute; Chronic; Copper; Pollution

Funding

  1. Woods Hole Sea Grant [C120343]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colonial ascidians are a group of prolific invaders found in urban marine environments. Despite often high levels of pollution in these areas, some species of ascidians not only tolerate but thrive in these conditions, while native species decline. The role of pollution tolerance in establishment success is often overlooked, and therefore the mechanisms employed by invaders are poorly understood. This research explores both acute and chronic copper toxicity of Botrylloides violaceus, a prominent invader in the Gulf of Maine, and a native counterpart, Aplidium glabrum. Acute toxicity tests revealed that B. violaceus larvae are significantly more tolerant to exposure than A. glabrum larvae (median effective concentration for settlement inhibition [EC50] values = 107.9 and 46.7 mu g l(-)(1), respectively). Further, the results indicate that B. violaceus is more tolerant than members of several other native benthic phyla using a species sensitivity distribution approach. Chronic toxicity tests determined that EC50 values impacting the number of zooids per colony and colony area for A. glabrum were achieved at environmentally relevant concentrations of copper, while B. violaceus values were over twice the concentration (approximately 8 and 20 mu g l(-1), respectively). These findings support the hypothesis that invader pollution tolerance is indeed greater than that of native species, both within and beyond the same phyla, and likely plays a role in invader establishment and spread as described in the invader tolerance model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available