4.7 Review

Computational Methodologies in the Exploration of Marine Natural Product Leads

Journal

MARINE DRUGS
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/md16070236

Keywords

Computer-Aided Drug Design (CADD); drug discovery; chemoinformatics; bioinformatics; machine learning (ML); marine natural products (MNPs)

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) Portugal [SFRH/BPD/108237/2015]
  2. LAQV - FCT/MEC [UID/QUI/50006/2013]
  3. ERDF under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007265]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computational methodologies are assisting the exploration of marine natural products (MNPs) to make the discovery of new leads more efficient, to repurpose known MNPs, to target new metabolites on the basis of genome analysis, to reveal mechanisms of action, and to optimize leads. In silico efforts in drug discovery of NPs have mainly focused on two tasks: dereplication and prediction of bioactivities. The exploration of new chemical spaces and the application of predicted spectral data must be included in new approaches to select species, extracts, and growth conditions with maximum probabilities of medicinal chemistry novelty. In this review, the most relevant current computational dereplication methodologies are highlighted. Structure-based (SB) and ligand-based (LB) chemoinformatics approaches have become essential tools for the virtual screening of NPs either in small datasets of isolated compounds or in large-scale databases. The most common LB techniques include Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR), estimation of drug likeness, prediction of adsorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) properties, similarity searching, and pharmacophore identification. Analogously, molecular dynamics, docking and binding cavity analysis have been used in SB approaches. Their significance and achievements are the main focus of this review.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available