3.8 Proceedings Paper

The use of micrometeorological data to identify significant variables in evapotranspiration modeling

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.031

Keywords

reference evapotranspiration; actual evapotranspiration; Penman-Monteith; Priestley-Taylor; eddy covariance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because of the crucial role that plays in the hydrological water balance, evapotranspiration estimation has always represented a field of substantial and continuous scientific application. Evapotranspiration fluxes are however and objectively difficult to be measured and predicted. Many different models have then been reported in the related literature, which are able to quantify the evapotranspiration process starting from a more or less reduced database of empirical data. The present paper aims at the comparison between models of maximum crop and actual evapotranspiration (ET0) applied to an eddy covariance micrometeorological tower located in Southern Italy. In particular, the Penman-Monteith model, in the simplified version proposal of FAO, and the model of Priestley-Taylor, have been herein considered. On a daily time scale of aggregation, both examined models have good capacity in the estimation of evapotranspiration fluxes. Using a database input of daily average air temperatures and analytically calculating the other relevant parameters, both the simplified method proposed by FAO Penman-Monteithand the Pristley-Taylor model show a comparable fit to the observed data, with a similar over-prediction of about respectively 17% and 14%. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available