4.7 Article

Influence of sampling and DNA extraction on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing - Comparison of the bacterial community between two food processing plants

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 186-192

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.12.027

Keywords

16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing; DNA extraction; Sampling; Dairy production; Listeria monocytogenes

Funding

  1. Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy
  2. National Foundation of Research, Technology and Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

16S rRNA amplicon sequencing is frequently used to investigate and compare microbiomes. This study focuses on the potential, applicability and limits of 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing for comparing the microbiomes of two dairy production plants, one of which experienced recurrent contamination with Listeria monocytogenes. During preceding in vitro studies, DNA extraction of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica ser. Typhimurium with two extraction kits (PowerSoil and NucleoSpin) revealed differences between these exemplary bacteria and both extraction methods. When equivalent samples of the companies were processed independently with both methods, sequencing results demonstrated also bacterium specific variances. These variances do not reflect a direct correlation between Gram-positive or-negative bacteria and the performance of both kits. Despite these differences, the analysis with a non-metric multi-dimensional scaling plot showed grouping of respective samples independent of the DNA extraction method. Some operational taxonomic units (OTUs) occurred predominantly in one of the companies, but none of them generated a clear hypothesis why one of the plants had recurrent contamination with L. monocytogenes. This work provides insights into the microbiomes of the two dairy companies but advises cautions in over-interpreting sequencing results as selective DNA extraction and sampling only reflect components of prevalent bacterial communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available