3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Empirical Analysis of Programming Language Adoption

Journal

ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES
Volume 48, Issue 10, Pages 1-18

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/2509136.2509515

Keywords

Languages; Human Factors; programming language adoption; survey research

Funding

  1. Microsoft [024263]
  2. Intel [024894]
  3. U.C. Discovery [DIG07-10227]
  4. Par Lab affiliates National Instruments
  5. Nokia
  6. NVIDIA
  7. Oracle
  8. Samsung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Some programming languages become widely popular while others fail to grow beyond their niche or disappear altogether. This paper uses survey methodology to identify the factors that lead to language adoption. We analyze large datasets, including over 200,000 SourceForge projects, 590,000 projects tracked by Ohloh, and multiple surveys of 1,000-13,000 programmers. We report several prominent findings. First, language adoption follows a power law; a small number of languages account for most language use, but the programming market supports many languages with niche user bases. Second, intrinsic features have only secondary importance in adoption. Open source libraries, existing code, and experience strongly influence developers when selecting a language for a project. Language features such as performance, reliability, and simple semantics do not. Third, developers will steadily learn and forget languages. The overall number of languages developers are familiar with is independent of age. Finally, when considering intrinsic aspects of languages, developers prioritize expressivity over correctness. They perceive static types as primarily helping with the latter, hence partly explaining the popularity of dynamic languages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available