4.7 Article

Tapioca starch-pullulan interaction during gelation and retrogradation

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 432-438

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.05.064

Keywords

Gelatinization; Intermolecular interaction; Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance; Rapid visco-analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31701622]
  2. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2018CFB606]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2662018JC022]
  4. Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System [CARS 41-K23]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction between pullulan (PU) and tapioca starch (TS) during gelatinization and retrogradation was studied in this paper. TS and PU were prepared into a TS/PU composite system at the ratios of 10/0, 9.5/0.5, 9.0/1.0, 8.5/1.5 and 8.0/2.0 g/g. The addition of PU tended to decrease the peak, breakdown and final viscosity of the composite system. The increasing tan delta of the dynamic viscoelastic measurement suggested that PU enhanced the liquid-like properties of TS gels. The decreased setback values and the slower increase of the storage modulus at 4 degrees C indicated that the short-term retrogradation of TS was restrained. Meanwhile, the peaks of X-ray diffraction became lower and wider, revealing that PU could inhibit the long-term retrogradation of TS. The FTIR spectra showed that the absorption peak of the O-H stretching gradually redshifted with increasing PU content, suggesting that a strong intermolecular hydrogen binding occurred between TS and PU. From low -field nuclear magnetic resonance, the spin-spin relaxation time decreased from 1687 ms (TS/PU = 10.0/0) to 1427 ms (TS/PU = 8.0/2.0), illustrating that the addition of PU promotes the water retention ability of the TS paste. Therefore, PU had an effect on TS gelatinization and retrogradation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available