4.3 Article

Efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 antibody rituximab for patients with refractory systemic lupus erythematosus

Journal

LUPUS
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 802-811

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0961203317749047

Keywords

Renal lupus; systemic lupus erythematosus; neuropsychiatric lupus

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  4. University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
  5. UOEH Grant for Advanced Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective We examined the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with refractory systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods The study enrolled 63 SLE patients who were treated with rituximab between 2002 and 2015. The participants underwent a battery of tests before treatment and at one year. Treatment ranged from two to four times at 500 or 1000mg. Results Baseline characteristics were males:females=6:57, age 33.9 years, and disease duration 87.2 months. The primary endpoint: The rate of major clinical response (MCR) was 60% while the partial clinical response (PCR) was 25%. Thirty of 36 (83%) patients with lupus nephritis (WHO II: 2, III: 5, IV: 22, V: 4, IV+V: 2, not assessed: 1) and 22 of 24 patients (92%) with neuropsychiatric SLE, who could be followed at one year, showed changes from BILAG A or B score to C or D score at one year. Multivariate analysis identified high anti-dsDNA antibody and shorter disease duration as significant determinants of MCR at one year. Repeat examination was conducted at five years. Primary failure was recorded in 8.8% and secondary failure in 32.4% (time to relapse: 24.4 months). Rituximab was well tolerated although 65 adverse events, mostly infections, were recorded within one year. Conclusion Rituximab is potentially efficacious for the treatment of patients with refractory SLE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available