4.5 Article

Coronary artery disease in decompensated patients undergoing liver transplantation evaluation

Journal

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 333-342

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1002/lt.25012

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is an important contributor to morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). However, the current literature is limited by sampling bias and nondefinitive assessment of CAD. The current study examines the prevalence of CAD via per protocol coronary angiography and its relationship to etiology of liver disease in patients undergoing liver transplantation evaluation (LTE). Data on 228 patients were prospectively collected who had coronary angiography as part of LTE between 2011 and 2014. Coronary angiography was done in all patients age 50 years or with CAD risk factors. CAD was defined as any coronary artery stenosis, whereas stenosis70% in distribution of 1 or 3 major coronary arteries was considered as single- or triple-vessel disease. CAD was detected in 36.8% of patients, with the highest prevalence among nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients with cirrhosis (52.8%). Prevalence of single-vessel disease was higher among patients with NASH compared with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and alcoholic cirrhosis (15.1% versus 4.6% versus 6.6%; P=0.02). Similarly, patients with NASH were more likely to have triple-vessel disease when compared with HCV and alcoholic cirrhosis (9.4% versus 0.9% versus 0%; P=0.001). While adjusting for traditional risk factors for CAD, only NASH as etiology of liver disease remained significantly associated with CAD. Complications from diagnostic coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention were low (2.6%). In conclusion, patients undergoing LTE have a high prevalence of CAD, which varies widely depending on etiology of liver cirrhosis. The procedural complications from coronary angiography are low. Liver Transplantation 24 333-342 2018 AASLD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available