4.7 Article

Research Note: Mapping spatial patterns in sewer age, material, and proximity to surface waterways to infer sewer leakage hotspots

Journal

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages 320-324

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.011

Keywords

Urban stream; Sanitation; Stream burial; Sewer leakage; Hotspot mapping

Funding

  1. University of Pittsburgh
  2. National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) National Science Foundation [DBI-1052875]
  3. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
  4. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1052875] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identifying areas where deteriorating sewer infrastructure is in close proximity to surface waterways is needed to map likely connections between sewers and streams. We present a method to estimate sewer installation year and deterioration status using historical maps of the sewer network, parcel-scale property assessment data, and pipe material. Areas where streams were likely buried into the sewer system were mapped by intersecting the historical stream network derived from a 10-m resolution digital elevation model with sewer pipe locations. Potential sewer leakage hotspots were mapped by identifying where aging sewer pipes are in close proximity (50-m) to surface waterways. Results from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (USA), indicated 41% of the historical stream length was lost or buried and the potential interface between sewers and streams is great. The co-location of aging sewer infrastructure ( > 75 years old) near stream channels suggests that 42% of existing streams are located in areas with a high potential for sewer leakage if sewer infrastructure fails. Mapping the sewer-stream interface provides an approach to better understand areas where failing sewers may contribute a disproportional amount of nutrients and other pathogens to surface waterways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available