4.8 Article

Culturing Fibroblasts in 3D Human Hair Keratin Hydrogels

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 5187-5198

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b00854

Keywords

keratin; hydrogel; 3D cell culture; fibroblast; cell compliance; tissue engineering

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Singapore [RG42/13]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81101353, 81371964]
  3. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning [1220000187]
  4. National Young Thousand-Talent Scheme
  5. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [13QA1402400]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human hair keratins are readily available, easy to extract, and eco-friendly materials with natural bioactivities. Keratin-based materials have been studied for applications such as cell culture substrates, internal hemostats for liver injury, and conduits for peripheral nerve repair. However, there are limited reports of using keratin-based 3D scaffolds for cell culture in vitro. Here, we describe the development of a 3D hair keratin hydrogel, which allows for living cell encapsulation under near physiological conditions. The convenience of making the hydrogels from keratin solutions in a simple and controllable manner is demonstrated, giving rise to constructs with tunable physical properties. This keratin hydrogel is comparable to collagen hydrogels in supporting the viability and proliferation of L929 murine fibroblasts. Notably, the keratin hydrogels contract less significantly as compared to the collagen hydrogels, over a 16-day culture period. In addition, preliminary in vivo studies in immunocompetent animals show mild acute host tissue response. These results collectively demonstrate the potential of cell-loaded keratin hydrogels as 3D cell culture systems, which may be developed for clinically relevant applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available