4.4 Article

The impact of international economic sanctions on Iranian cancer healthcare

Journal

HEALTH POLICY
Volume 119, Issue 10, Pages 1309-1318

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.08.012

Keywords

Iran; International sanctions; Oncology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In 2012, Iranian's economy collapsed under strain from sanctions instituted to stop Iran from violating the International Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Sanctions have indirectly led to serious healthcare concerns, specifically cancer treatment. This is the first report to evaluate Iranian cancer healthcare while under international economic sanctions. Methods: Data and information were identified by searches of MEDLINE, PubMed, and references from relevant articles using the search terms: Iran, health policy, sanctions, ethics, and cancer. Articles published in the English language between 1966 and present were included, based on relevance to sanctions or the specific case of sanctions in Iran. Results: The Program of Action for Cancer Therapy evaluated Iran's National Cancer Control Program (NCCP), reporting it has substantial deficits, including prevention, diagnosis/treatment, palliative care, monitoring, and technology, with a serious drug shortage for cancer care. Sanctions have exemptions for medicines and food, but lead to disruption of health services through complications in transportation, transferring currencies or lack of money. Conclusion: There is increasing evidence that sanctions harm vulnerable populations, while blocking globalization and not creating political or social change quickly. Improvement of Iran's NCCP is not feasible, and the health of cancer patients will continue to decline while the sanctions are in effect. The solution is complex, but a modern and innovative approach to diplomacy, which includes human rights, is necessary. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available