Journal
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 460-475Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0275074012447676
Keywords
interlocal agreements; multilateral agreement; mutual aid agreement; public safety; emergency management; institutional collective action
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Although much has been written about interlocal agreements for the delivery of services, few studies have examined the factors that influence the establishment of different types of multilateral agreements (MLAs). To address this lacuna, the authors draw a distinction between an adaptive and restrictive MLA and seek to understand why local governments enter into one type of arrangement over the other. The authors build our theoretical argument on the basis of previous research that suggests agreements are designed to minimize the uncertainties associated with transaction risk. On the basis of this premise, the author's general proposition is that the decision to establish an adaptive MLA is shaped by the asset specificity and measurability of the goods and services of the transaction. The authors utilize data on public safety agreements among municipal and county governments in the state of Florida. Findings suggest that local governments are more likely to form an adaptive MLA when goods and services are relatively high in service measurability difficulty and when both high and low asset specificity exit.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available