4.7 Article

The positive role of vitronectin in radiation induced lung toxicity: the in vitro and in vivo mechanism study

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-018-1474-y

Keywords

Radiation therapy; Radiation induced lung fibrosis; Vitronectin, Fibroblasts; TGF-beta

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81000993]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Radiation-induced lung toxicity (RILT) is a severe complication of radiotherapy in patients with thoracic tumors. Through proteomics, we have previously identified vitronectin (VTN) as a potential biomarker for patients with lung toxicity of grade >= 2 radiation. Herein, we explored the molecular mechanism of VTN in the process of RILT Methods: In this study, lentivirus encoding for VTN and VTN-specific siRNA were constructed and transfected into the cultured fibroblasts and C57BL mice. Real-time PCR, western blot and ELISA were used to examine expression of collagens and several potential proteins involved in lung fibrosis. Hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical staining were used to assess the fibrosis scores of lung tissue from mice received irradiation. Results: The expression of VTN was up-regulated by irradiation. The change trend of collagens, TGF-beta expression and p-ERK, p-AKT, and p-JNK expression levels were positively related with VTN mRNA level. Furthermore, overexpression of VTN significantly increased the expression level of alpha-SMA, as well as the degree of lung fibrosis in mice at 8 and 12 weeks post-irradiation. By contrast, siRNA VTN induced opposite results both in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: VTN played a positive role in the lung fibrosis of RILT, possibly through modulation of fibrosis regulatory pathways and up-regulating the expression levels of fibrosis-related genes. Taken together, all the results suggested that VTN had a novel therapeutic potential for the treatment of RILT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available