4.2 Article

Airway and systemic inflammatory responses to ultrafine carbon black particles and ozone in older healthy subjects

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2018.1463331

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [JO284/10-1]
  2. German Center for Lung Research, DZL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased adverse health effects in older subjects due to exposure to ambient air pollutants may be related to the inflammatory response induced by these contaminants. The aim of this study was to assess airway and systemic inflammatory responses in older healthy subjects to a controlled experimental exposure with spark-generated elemental carbon black ultrafine particles (cbUFPs) and ozone (O-3). Twenty healthy subjects, age 52-75years, were exposed on three occasions separated by at least 8weeks. The exposures to filtered air (FA), to cbUFP (50g/m(3)), or to cbUFP in combination with 250ppb ozone (cbUFP+O-3) for 3h with intermittent exercise were performed double blind, and in random order. Sputum and blood samples were collected 3.5h after each exposure. Exposure to cbUFP+O-3 significantly increased plasma club cell protein 16 (CC16), the number of sputum cells, the number and percent of sputum neutrophils, and sputum interleukin 6 and matrix metalloproteinase 9. Exposure to cbUFP alone exerted no marked effect, except for an elevation in sputum neutrophils in a subgroup of 13 subjects that displayed less than 65% sputum neutrophils after FA exposure. None of the inflammatory markers was correlated with age, and serum cardiovascular risk markers were not markedly affected by cbUFP or cbUFP+O-3. Exposure to cbUFP+O-3 induced a significant airway and systemic inflammatory response in older healthy volunteer subjects. The effects induced by cbUFP alone suggest that the inflammation was predominantly mediated by O-3, although one cannot rule out that the interaction of cbUFP and O-3 played a role.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available