4.6 Article

von Willebrand factor propeptide to antigen ratio identifies platelet activation and reduced von Willebrand factor survival phenotype in mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 546-554

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jth.13934

Keywords

blood coagulation; platelet activation; von Willebrand disease; von Willebrand factor; von willebrand factor propolypeptide

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-081588]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Reduced plasma survival of von Willebrand factor (VWF) is characteristic of patients with type 1C von Willebrand disease (VWD). These subjects can be identified by an increased steady-state ratio of plasma VWF propeptide (VWFpp) to VWF antigen (VWF: Ag). A similar phenotype occurs in mice with the Mvwf1 allele. Objectives: To (i) determine if the VWFpp/VWF: Ag ratio can be used to identify a 'type 1C' phenotype in mice, (ii) determine the most reliable method for murine blood sampling, and (iii) identify the source of VWF released during problematic blood collection. Methods: 'Platelet-VWF' and 'endothelial-VWF' mice were generated by bone marrow transplantation between C57BL/6J and VWF-/- mice. Several blood sampling methods were used and murine VWFpp and VWF: Ag levels determined. Plasma and platelet VWF: Ag and VWFpp, VWF multimers and VWF halflife were examined in mouse strains with and without Mvwf1. Results: A single retro-orbital bleed and vena cava collection were found to be the optimal methods of blood collection. Problematic collection resulted in release of VWF from platelets and endothelium. The VWFpp/VWF: Ag ratio identified strains of mice with reduced VWF survival. Conclusion: Assay of murine VWFpp and VWF: Ag has utility in determining the acceptability of murine blood samples for coagulation testing and in identification of a reduced VWF survival phenotype in mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available