4.5 Article

Turbulent convective heat transfer of methane at supercritical pressure in a helical coiled tube

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 55-63

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11630-018-0984-5

Keywords

Helically coiled tube; Supercritical pressure; Methane; Heat transfer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50976080]
  2. Hubei Young Talent Project [Q20161502]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The heat transfer of methane at supercritical pressure in a helically coiled tube was numerically investigated using the Reynolds Stress Model under constant wall temperature. The effects of mass flux (G), inlet pressure (P-in) and buoyancy force on the heat transfer behaviors were discussed in detail. Results show that the light fluid with higher temperature appears near the inner wall of the helically coiled tube. When the bulk temperature is less than or approach to the pseudocritical temperature (T-pc ), the combined effects of buoyancy force and centrifugal force make heavy fluid with lower temperature appear near the outer-right of the helically coiled tube. Beyond the T-pc , the heavy fluid with lower temperature moves from the outer-right region to the outer region owing to the centrifugal force. The buoyancy force caused by density variation, which can be characterized by Gr/Re-2 and Gr/Re-2.7, enhances the heat transfer coefficient (h) when the bulk temperature is less than or near the T-pc , and the h experiences oscillation due to the buoyancy force. The oscillation is reduced progressively with the increase of G. Moreover, h reaches its peak value near the T-pc . Higher G could improve the heat transfer performance in the whole temperature range. The peak value of h depends on P-in. A new correlation was proposed for methane at supercritical pressure convective heat transfer in the helical tube, which shows a good agreement with the present simulated results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available