4.7 Article

Synergistic flame-retardant effects of aluminum phosphate and Trimer in ethylene-vinyl acetate composites

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages 919-926

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-018-7026-0

Keywords

Aluminum phosphate; Trimer; Flame retardant; Smoke suppression; EVA

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21306035, 21276059]
  2. Key Basic Research Project of Hebei Province [16961402D]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of flame-retardant ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) composites with different contents of aluminum phosphate (AHP) and Trimer were prepared. The synergistic flame-retardant effects of the Trimer with AHP in EVA/AHP blends were studied by limiting oxygen index (LOI) tests, UL-94 tests, cone calorimeter tests, thermogravimetric analysis, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The LOI and UL-94 results showed that the system containing AHP and Trimer was very effective in improving the flame retardancy of EVA. When the mass ratio of AHP and Trimer was 3:1, the highest flame retardancy could be obtained, and when the flame-retardant loading was 30 wt%, the EVA/AHP/Trimer (7.5%) sample could achieve the V-0 rating in UL-94 tests, at the same time, its LOI value was 24.4%. The TG and DTG results showed that the addition of flame retardants catalyzes EVA decomposition in the first stage and generates a more stable char residue in the second stage. Consequently, an efficient reduction in the flammability parameters, such as heat release rate, total heat release, smoke production rate, and total smoke production could be observed. In addition, it was observed from the SEM observations of the morphological features that the AHP and Trimer combination, at the optimum proportion, could promote the formation of compact charred layers and prevent their cracking, which effectively protected the underlying materials from burning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available