4.3 Article

Effect of Two Novel Experimental Microdiet Types on Growth, Survival, and Pigmentation during the Weaning Period of the Fine Flounder, Paralichthys adspersus, Larvae

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE WORLD AQUACULTURE SOCIETY
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages 770-779

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jwas.12526

Keywords

microdiets; microextrusion marumerization; Paralichthys adspersus; particle-assisted rotational agglomeration; weaning

Categories

Funding

  1. National Innovation Program for Competitiveness and Productivity Innovate-PERU [236-FINCyT-IA-2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to evaluate two new types of experimental weaning microdiets for fish larvae, using the same formulation, but with different manufacturing processes, microextrusion marumerization (MEM) and particle-assisted rotational agglomeration (PARA). Both microdiets were compared to a commercial microdiet, Otohime (OTO), during the weaning of the fine flounder, Paralichthys adspersus. Weaning was achieved by cofeeding with live food from 40 to 50 d after hatch (d.a.h.). Thereafter, only the microdiets were fed to the end of the study (60 d.a.h.), where the total length, dry weight, and survival rates were 15.9 +/- 3.20, 14.3 +/- 1.72, and 14.4 +/- 2.28mm; 8.83 +/- 3.40, 5.53 +/- 2.85, and 7.10 +/- 3.56mg; 18.1, 16.3, and 15.2%, for OTO, MEM, and PARA, respectively. The dry weight and total length were significantly higher (P<0.05) for larvae fed OTO compared with those fed MEM. There were no differences between the other comparisons. Based on these results, any of the two experimental microdiets can be used for future investigations. However, we recommend the PARA microdiets because the manufacturing process produces less-dense and smaller particle size diets, reducing sinking rates and increasing the probability of the larvae in detecting and ingesting the diet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available