4.5 Article

Developmental speed affects the cryotolerance of in vitro produced buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos

Journal

ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.4081/ijas.2013.e80

Keywords

Buffalo; Embryo; Developmental; speed; Vitrification; Cryotop.

Funding

  1. MIUR-PRIN/2008 Project Strategies aimed to improve the efficiency of reproductive biotechnologies in buffalo species

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the developmental speed affects the cryotolerance of in vitro produced buffalo embryos. In Experiment 1, abattoir-derived oocytes were in vitro matured, fertilized and cultured. The embryos produced by Say 7 of culture were vitrified at the tight morula (TM), early blastocyst (EBL), blastocyst (BL), expanded-blastocyst (XBL) and hatched-blastocyst (HBL) stage. The embryos were vitrified by cryotop in 16.5% ethylene glycol (EG) and 16.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 0.5 M sucrose. Embryos were warmed in 0.25 M sucrose for 1 min and then in 0.15 M sucrose for 5 min and cultured in vitro for 24 h, to evaluate post-culture viability. In Experiment 2, ovum pick-up (OPU) was carried out on lactating buffaloes to produce embryos that were vitrified-warmed and transferred into synchronized recipients. The lowest (P< 0.01) survival rates were recorded with TM (22.4%) and the highest (P< 0.01) with HBL (84.5%), whereas intermediate results were observed with EBL, BL and XBL (54.5, 64.7, 67.9%, respectively). Pregnancy rate on both Days 25 and 45 was significantly higher (P< 0.05) for faster ( XBL and HBL) developing embryos (75.0% and 62.5%, respectively) than for the slower (TM, EBL and BL) developing counterparts (36.4% and 0, respectively). Interestingly, pregnancies to term were only recorded when HBL were transferred (20%). In conclusion, it was demonstrated that the chronology of development is a major factor affecting the cryotolerance of in vitro produced buffalo embryos.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available