4.7 Article

Carnauba wax as a wall material for urea microencapsulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 99, Issue 3, Pages 1078-1087

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9275

Keywords

Copernicia prunifera; urea; slow-release system; animal nutrition

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Brazil)
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Greater Education Personnel
  3. Bahia State Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND The high ureolytic activity of rumen microbiota is a concern when urea is used in ruminant feed, because it leads to fast urea conversion, resulting in possible intoxication and lower nitrogen utilization. This study intended to microencapsulate urea using carnauba wax to obtain slow-release systems in the rumen. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, arranged in a 3 x 2 factorial, with the urea encapsulated with carnauba wax in ratios of 1 : 2; 1 : 3, and 1 : 4 (U(ME)2; U(ME)3, and U(ME)4) and two particles sizes (small, P-S; and large, P-L). RESULTS All formulations showed excellent properties, including inhibition of urea hygroscopicity. The formulation U(ME)2 exhibited the greatest yield (91.6%) and microencapsulation efficiency (99.6%) values, whereas the formulation U(ME)4 presented the greatest thermal stability (259.5 degrees C) and lowest moisture content (1.81%). The U(ME)2 formulation presented a slower release than the other U-ME formulations studied. CONCLUSION The production of urea microspheres using carnauba wax was successful for all microencapsulated systems developed, evidencing the promising potential for use in ruminant animal diets. The U(ME)2 formulation with large particles is the most recommended because it permitted greater resistance to microbial attack, allowing a slower release of urea into the rumen, reducing the risk of intoxication or ruminal alkalosis. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available