4.5 Article

Early Diffusion Of Gene Expression Profiling In Breast Cancer Patients Associated With Areas Of High Income Inequality

Journal

HEALTH AFFAIRS
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 609-615

Publisher

PROJECT HOPE
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UCSF TRANSPERS Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine - National Institutes of Health [5P01CA130818-03, 1UL1TR001102-01, 5R25CA087949-13]
  2. Aetna Grant [20121390]
  3. Harvard Catalyst
  4. Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center
  5. National Research Service Award Primary Care Research Fellowship [T32HP19025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the Affordable Care Act reducing coverage disparities, social factors could prominently determine where and for whom innovations first diffuse in health care markets. Gene expression profiling is a potentially cost-effective innovation that guides chemotherapy decisions in early-stage breast cancer, but adoption has been uneven across the United States. Using a sample of commercially insured women, we evaluated whether income inequality in metropolitan areas was associated with receipt of gene expression profiling during its initial diffusion in 2006-07. In areas with high income inequality, gene expression profiling receipt was higher than elsewhere, but it was associated with a 10.6-percentage-point gap between high-and low-income women. In areas with low rates of income inequality, gene expression profiling receipt was lower, with no significant differences by income. Even among insured women, income inequality may indirectly shape diffusion of gene expression profiling, with benefits accruing to the highest-income patients in the most unequal places. Policies reducing gene expression profiling disparities should address low-inequality areas and, in unequal places, practice settings serving low-income patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available